Jack Conneely
Department, Institution: Centre for Multidisciplinary and Intercultural Inquiry, UCL
UBEL Pathway: Gender and Sexuality
Supervisor: Dr. Thibaut Raobin (primary) and Dr. Alex Hyde (secondary)
Contact details: jack.conneely0@gmail.com
Social Media: http://www.linkedin.com/in/jack-conneely-031032192
About Me
I hold an MSc in Gender, Peace, and Security from the London School of Economics and Political Science, and a BA in Sociology and Social Policy from Trinity College Dublin. My writing has been published by the University of Oxford and the United Nations, and is held in the Archive of the Irish in Britain. My research has been cited in articles by The Times, The Guardian, and The Financial Times. Research that I contributed to at Ireland’s Think-tank for Action on Social Change (TASC) further received praise from the President of Ireland, Michael D. Higgins, and former UN High Commissioner for Human Rights and Chair of the Elders, Mary Robinson.
My research interests include the coloniality of gender, transnational solidarity, and Irish nationalism. I take an interdisciplinary and ethnographic approach, guided by a strong commitment to positionality and self-reflexivity.
Recently, I have worked in the NGO research sector across Europe on prevention-focused initiatives, ranging from peacebuilding and disarmament to sexual violence and AI arms treaties.
Outside of academia, I am a passionate advocate for the preservation of Gaeilge, the Irish language, and a lover of music and literature.
My Research
My research examines how colonial, nationalist, and Catholic legacies continue to shape the lives of young Queer Catholic men in post-conflict Ireland. While Ireland has recently been celebrated for progressive social reforms, such as marriage equality (2015) and abortion rights (2018), focusing solely on these milestones can obscure the enduring cultural and structural forces that continue to marginalise minority identities. This fixation on national achievements often evades critical discussion of how recent Irish history has affected marginalised communities, from the systemic abuses of the Magdalene Laundries to the violence and social legacies of the Troubles, and the criminalisation and marginalisation of Queer people.
These legacies must not be read merely as discrete forms of oppression for the Other. Rather, they operate as a reinterpretation of Irish nationhood and sexuality, co-constructed and haunted by the long temporalities of conflict and colonialism. By interrogating the impact of Church and State on queer individuals from a post-conflict and postcolonial perspective, this research seeks to reframe Western-centric Queer theory from within a Western context, centring lived experience in the Irish setting to reveal how historical, cultural, and political forces continue to shape identity, belonging, and social hierarchies today.
Using qualitative methods—including semi-structured interviews, focus groups, and autoethnographic input—this study explores how young Queer Catholic men navigate the tensions between religious upbringing and sexual identity. By foregrounding their lived experiences, it challenges a bifurcated narrative of a wholly progressive Ireland and a pathologised Queer, inquiring into how colonial and religious ideologies continue to influence national identity and personal belonging.
When treaties, peace accords, or even the decriminalisation of homosexuality are treated as discrete events—achievements to be marked, moments to pass—we overlook how these shifts endure. Irish anti-colonial nationalisms remain heteronormative and thus marginalise Queer struggle and liberation, stifling the imagination of a more egalitarian post-colonial Ireland. When non-normative political subjectivities are placed at the centre of analyses of post-independence Ireland, it raises questions about how the goals—and endpoints—of Irish nationalism hold up.
Impact of My Research
This research occupies a space between two opposing narratives of Queer Catholic life in Ireland. One casts Queer Catholics as trapped in cycles of guilt, repression, and social Othering; the other celebrates Ireland as a progressive beacon, a nation that has left its past behind through radical social reform. By disrupting both of these simplistic stories, this study offers a nuanced exploration of Queer Catholic lives caught between the weight of history and the myths of modern liberation. It foregrounds the experiences of those whose identities are shaped not only by sexuality, but by religious, colonial, and nationalist legacies, revealing how these forces continue to shape social belonging, political recognition, and everyday life.
Ireland now stands at a moment of reflection: twenty-five years since the cessation of the Troubles and a century since the founding of the Republic. By centring Queer political subjectivities, this research illuminates how Irish decolonial nationalism continues to reproduce heteronormative frameworks, even within narratives of national liberation. In doing so, it interrogates the contradictions of a nation that celebrates its social reforms while leaving unexamined the enduring cultural, structural, and religious mechanisms that marginalise Queer communities.
Moreover, while current transnational solidarity networks often focus on shared histories of settler colonialism—such as Palestine, India, and Australia—this study offers a more nuanced understanding of transnational, transcontextual solidarity by considering how Ireland’s own postcolonial condition informs and interacts with global Queer struggles.
The research is guided by questions that extend across the personal, political, and scholarly: How do the objectives and narratives of Irish decolonial nationalism shift when Queer political subjectivities are placed at the centre? How do young Queer Catholic men reconcile tensions between religious upbringing and sexual identity, and how do these experiences challenge narratives of a wholly “progressive” Ireland? How do the lingering legacies of colonialism, nationalism, and Catholic theocracy continue to haunt sociopolitical and personal identity, and what forms of individual or collective resistance emerge in response?